No, that isn't a typo.
Andy Hawes has played Dux Bellorum a few times, notably in a big demo game at this year's Salute for which he and his co-conspirators deservedly won an award. Monday night saw us try a basic 32 pt a side battle, with, predictable, Andy's Romano-British against my Saxons.
Given it was my first game, and I'd only skimmed the rules on Kindle the previous night, unsurprisingly I lost!
Very much a classic warband vs. shieldwall grinder - on my left, my Companion cavalry and Andy's beat each other to a standstill, on the right I somehow managed to lose a cavalry duel, and as a result one of Andy's units of horse rolled up the centre, where four warbands were pounding four units in shieldwall.
The basic problem was that, taking losses, I started losing command points, and thus took more losses due to not having command points to prevent it :D
Pretty good fun, though: for that scale of combat it plays better than WAB - less random, and more convincing, I think. On the whole? Still prefer Dux Britanniarum, but then that's partly because I have a lot invested in the campaign!
WAB, WECW, Dux Britanniarum, IABSM3 and many other wargames rules, mostly in 28 and 15mm.
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Battle Report - 9 September 2013 - Dux Bellorum
Labels:
ancients,
battle report,
dark ages,
dux bellorum
1 comment:
Views and opinions expressed here are those of the commenter, not mine. I reserve the right to delete comments if I consider them unacceptable. Unfortunately due to persistent spam from one source, I've been forced to turn on captchas for comments.
Comments on posts older than 7 days will go into a moderation queue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Cheeky!
ReplyDelete