To be perfectly honest, it was too darn hot to play WAB, or anything else with that level of occasionally nit-picky rules. But I did need the practice, so Grahame and I tried one of the scenarios for the Rushden Axes tournament in August, his Late Imperial Romans against my Palmyrans.
What can I say? I lost :D It was fun, though.
Made for some interesting setup choices: clearly I had to charge my cataphracts down the length of the table, since in WAB they are a bit like Disaster Area's sunship - steer like an absolute cow.
One unit of cataphracts got stuck into one of Grahame's cohorts, which tends to favour the cataphracts as they have a ridiculously good save.
As they say - a battle's only a waste if you don't learn from it...
In other news - where would you keep the new, unpainted figure that's the general for your cataphract-based army...
Yes, that's right. In the box with the cataphracts, you idiot!!!
Sometimes, I am hopeless. :D
There's still people out there playing WAB?
ReplyDeleteI used to be a fan until I got fed up after the release of the last edition full of mistakes and then it being dropped by the publisher. A shame
I liked WAB when I first found it. Made an Early Hebrew army with Ark of the Covenant and all.
ReplyDeleteI ahve a Royal Hittite army with all type of allies: Cannanites, Mytanni, Phoenicians, Sea Peoples... oh man! I love the Bronze Age period and the masess of chariots clashing!! If only I had some good rules to play now...
DeleteI like the idea of triangular set up and will definitely try this the next time!
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing, Mike!